PayVerify vs Coinbase Commerce
Both let you accept crypto. The difference is custody, chains, recurring billing — and, as of 2026, who Coinbase Commerce will still serve.
Side by side
| PayVerify | Coinbase Commerce | |
|---|---|---|
| Custody model | Non-custodial — funds to your wallet | Platform-mediated |
| Holds your keys | Never | Account-based |
| TON / USDT-TON | First-class | Limited |
| Recurring subscriptions | Yes, non-custodial | Limited |
| Self-hostable | Yes (~€5/mo box) | No |
| Signed webhooks | HMAC, durable retries | Yes |
| International merchants | Yes | US & Singapore only (from Mar 31, 2026) |
| Pricing model | Flat / self-host (no cut of your revenue) | 1% per transaction |
When PayVerify is the better fit
You want funds to land directly in your own wallet, you're building on TON or want cheap USDT settlement, you need recurring crypto subscriptions, you want the option to self-host, or you're an international merchant losing Coinbase Commerce in 2026.
When Coinbase Commerce might suit you
You're US- or Singapore-based, you prefer an account-based dashboard over running any infrastructure, and you don't need recurring billing or TON-native settlement. A fair comparison names the tradeoffs both ways.
Migrating is mostly a webhook swap
Replace your "create charge" call with POST /v1/invoices, point your success logic at PayVerify's signed webhook, and set your receiving wallet. See the docs for the full flow.